A collection of useful modifications for the P3Steel v.4, as described by the basis of a draft from the P3Steel, with metal elements for X-Axis made on basis of I3 CORDOBESA Full Steel 1/8″ LASERCUT with Bowden extruder.
It is worth noting that a number of these modifications can also be applied to other cartesian 3D printers, such as the Wilson II. Some of the modifications/upgrades could also be applied to other 3D printers, such as Delta printers (i.e. Kossel) for example, the reinforced GT2 belt, and Extruder stepper with planetary gearbox.
This frame was sourced from eBay, Frame Prusa I3 P3Steel v4.0 +RODS+metal elements for X-Axis
- The search for the elusive X-axis idler rod
- P3Steel construction videos
- P3Steel – Parts and Sources
- P3Steel from Poland – A tale of despair, dismay and woe
Here is a list of links:
- P3Steel parts by Fizzbod – The Toolsen Bowden extruder mount (see below) at the top of the Z axis, is interesting, although it is not clear if additional drilling is required from the photos
- P3Steel – E3d V6 bowden dual extruder mount – This is actually a mount for the dual E3d v6 hotends of a Bowden
- P3steel 2.x – bowden extruder mount – by Toolsen
Endstops by Toolsen
- P3steel 2.x – X-axis endstop mount
- P3steel 2.x – Y-axis endstop mount
- P3steel 2.x – Z-axis endstop mount
Optical Endstops by Toolsen
Only Y axis, there are no X or Z axes optical endstops, as yet:
Idlers by Toolsen
Extruder by NWRepRap
Parts are listed here, on NWRepRap Prusa i3
Extruder Stepper Motor
If using a Bowden extruder, then use an extruder stepper motor with a planetary gearbox, see The extraordinary extruder.
GT2 belts with steel banding will not stretch.
It is probably a good idea to replace the 330 mm M5 threaded rods with superior T8 lead screws. A pitch and lead of 2 mm would be ideal, as opposed to a pitch of 2 mm and a lead of 4 or 8 mm. A 350 mm length, with a lead of 2 mm from 8mm Lead Screw Rod Z Axis Linear Rail Bar Shaft+T8 Nut For CNC 3D Printer Reprap, costs £5.28.
A pitch and lead of 1 mm could also be considered, although the cost will be higher. A 400 mm length from T8 Pitch 1mm / 2mm Lead 1/2/4/8mm Rod Stainless Lead Screw + brass color nut, costs £11.78.
Note that from this supplier, the cost of the leadscrew with either a 1 mm and 2 mm pitch/lead, is the same. A lead of 1 mm is probably a bit excessive. Somewhat bizarrely, from the same supplier, lijieqion_0, there is a significantly cheaper leadscrew with a 1 mm lead:
- Copper Nut with T8 Lead Screw Dia 8MM Pitch 1mm Lead 1mm Length 300mm 1pcs, £5.70
- Copper Nut with T8 Lead Screw Dia 8MM Pitch 1mm Lead 1mm Length 400mm 1pcs, £7.44
It is unclear why it is cheaper – is it because the nut is copper and not brass? Or is one Acme/Trapezoidal and the other square?
From Accuracy vs Precision and Threaded Rod vs Leadscrews in 3D Printers. I have highlighted the relevant parts:
In general, FFF/FDM printers use relatively infrequent, small, precise movements on the z-axis and consistent, fast movements on the x and y axes. A single start leadscrew with the tightest pitch possible (highest thread density, smallest pitch) is generally going to be your best bet for the z-axis, while you may or may not need something a little steeper to get the speeds you’d like from your x and y axes. While this may seem somewhat arbitrary given the precision of movement you can get from a stepper motor, an important factor to remember here is torque.
A more aggressive leadscrew will require more torque to drive. We have one kit printer we bought a couple years ago that has an overly aggressive multi-start leadscrew for the z-axis. The small motors included in the kit do not have the torque required to reliably start upward movement of the carriage, leaving it sitting there skipping steps until the carriage is given a little upward nudge to get it going (no, it’s not a lubrication issue or a driver that needs turning up).
So, a 2 mm lead is preferable to a 8 mm lead, as not only is less torque required, but also more precise movements are obtainable.
With respect to the layer heights, I found this nugget of information, from Ditch the threaded rod in your RepRap 3D printer and upgrade to a lead screw z-axis
It’s always better to use layer heights that are a multiple of your full step. If you trust in your micro-stepping you will get poor results because torque is very poor and the motor won’t stop very precisely. Best approach is to use a lead screw (whose longer step allows the gravity to work for you and eliminate backlash) and a stepper driver configured to 1/4 micro-step for low noise, but not for micro-layering. I always use multiples of my full step and have printed 0.040 (1 step), 0.080 (2 steps), 0.120 (3 steps and so on), 0.200, 0.600 and 0.800 mm (of course using 2 different nozzles). Do you need more than that?
See also Reddit – Lead screw opinions:
- The general consensus is that a 2 mm lead is preferable to a 8 mm lead.
- Lower the lead the better for an Z-Axis screw to allow for more precision
- No need for anti-backlash nuts for a Z-Axis if it has a decent amount of mass/weight to it.
- 1 mm will slow the printer down, but provide 0.005 mm (5μm) vertical movement.
That’s going to be awfully slow when homing. While you really don’t need speed for the z-axis, there’s not much point in going with such a low pitch… you won’t be printing anywhere near the layer heights that can achieve. In the end I guess it’s not a big deal, but I don’t see any reason to go below about a 4 mm pitch. A 1 mm pitch with a 1.8° stepper gives you 0.005 mm increments. Anything under 0.02 mm (which is sort of ridiculous anyways) is just unnecessary. Just my thoughts.
- An 8 mm lead can result in the weight of the X-axis gantry (especially in a P3Steel) overcoming the idle torque of the stepper. As a result of this, the X-axis gantry can end up sliding down the leadscrew, in particular at power down:
I have lead screws on my Z and it readily falls down if you kill the power. Regular threaded rod is much better at keeping it in place without power.
That’s one of the problems with 8mm lead 😉 With 2mm lead it will hold itself. The stepper motor provides a fair amount of resistance even when powered down.
Aluminium/Composite Y-axis carriage
With respect to the Y-axis carriage, the steel carriage does add a lot of weight/inertia, you are correct. This may or may not be an issue, depending on your steppers motors that you chose, and their torque. That said, the 3 mm steel print bed/Y-axis carriage, is ridiculously heavy, and it would be most wise to substitute it for an aluminium, plywood, or some other lightweight solution.
Apart from that the 3 mm steel frame is fine and as solid as a rock. There are a number of aluminium 20×30 print beds/Y-axis carriages available on eBay and Amazon. A thorough search should reveal a few. There are also composite Y-axis carriages, I found a supplier in the Ukraine,tehnologika_net, who, last year, had a number of different types at a reasonable cost – in fact they were the cheapest that I found.
See also Heatbeds. At the bottom there are some links to various alternative Y-axis carriages. However, some of the links/items may no longer be available.
Aluminium Composite Y-plate
are cheap, $21.89 + $9.00 – cheaper than 6 mm aluminium Y-plates – and are made from Aluminium composite panel (ACP), also aluminium composite material (ACM). See also Wanhao i3 6mm Y carriage.
It’s rare, but 3D printers can catch fire. Use the safety features provided by the firmware, but don’t solely rely on them. Both plain MOSFETs and solid state relays typically fail in their conducting state, which can result in runaway heating with disastrous outcomes. Thermal cutoff fuses are $1 components, but they are well able to prevent a runway heated bed from turning your workshop into a crater.
Enclosing your printer in a box prevents draft and the retained heat allows you to print larger objects from ABS with fewer distortions. The enclosure itself can be anything from a large enough box or a beautiful acrylic printarium. As long as the heat stays inside, it will just work. Keep the electronics of your printer outside the heated build chamber to prevent overheating of the motor drivers and power supply. Mind that actively heated build chambers also require actively cooled hotend-heatsinks.
Igus Drylin Linear Bearings
Use tribological, polymeric slide bearings instead of linear ball bearings. From Build a 3D printer workhorse, not an amazing disappointment machine:
As long as your build doesn’t exceed the typical size and weight of a desktop 3D printer, avoid using linear ball bearings in the X and Y axis, as they are a very common failure point. Their quality varies greatly depending on the manufacturer, and even if the cheap shot works seemingly great in the beginning, they won’t last for long. 3D printed plastic debris and even fragments of their own assembly will sooner or later cause them to block. Tribological, polymeric slide bearings are the way to go here. They are self-lubricating, maintenance-free and virtually last forever, at least by the standards of linear ball bearings. They are also available in Japan standard compatible form factors as drop-in replacements for the commonly used LM8UU.
Some examples of these LM10UU equivalent bearings, called Igus Drylin, are:
- 3D Printer Solid Polymer LM10UU Bearing – 10mm shaft – Igus Drylin RJ4JP-01-10, £7.95 + £5.50
- Igus DryLin® RJ4JP-01-10- 10x19x29mm – Polymer LM10UU Bearing – 3D Printer Re…, £17.95 + £38.40
- IGUS RJ4JP-01-10 drylin Linearlager Gleitlager 3D-Drucker RepRap Makerbot LM10UU, £11.39 + £4.64
Some examples of these LM8UU equivalent bearings, called Igus Drylin, are:
- 3D Printer Solid Polymer LM8UU Bearing – 8mm shaft – Igus Drylin RJ4JP-01-08, £13.94 (for 12) + Free/£5.50 (UK/Thailand)
- Igus DryLin® RJ4JP 01-08- 8x15x24mm – Polymer LM8UU Bearing – 3D Printer RepRap, £13.95 + £38.34
- Genuine Igus® Drylin® RJ4JP-01-08 8mm Linear Bearing x 8 Replace LM8UU RepRap, £10.90 + £3.25
- Genuine Igus® Drylin RJ4JP-01-08 Linear Bearing x 4 Replace LM8UU in 3D Reprap, £5.70 + £3.25
- Igus DryLin® RJ4JP-01-10- 10x19x29mm – Polymer LM10UU Bearing – 3D Printer Re…, £14.99 + £38.35
- Original Igus DryLin® R – RJ4JP 01-08 Linearlager statt LM8UU, RepRep 3d printer, £9.70 + £6.74
- Genuine Igus® Drylin RJ4JP-01-08 Linear Bearing x 1 Replace LM8UU in 3D RepRap, £2.25 + £3.25
- Igus Drylin RJ4JP-01-08 Anet A8 Prusa i3 3D Printer RepRap LM8UU Bearing 7 Pack!, £14.65 + £18.55
Preloaded Igus Drylin bearings
As Bernard comments below:
Those solid polymer Igus bearings you’re referencing are not preloaded; as such, they’ll perform worst than ball bearings. Opt for Igus bearings enclosed in aluminum instead (drylin® R – Linear plain bearing RJUM-01, mm)
These are somewhat more pricey, at £11 each (on the Igus site – they may be cheaper elsewhere). However, I would like to learn more about how the preloading works and why a RJUM-01 is such an improvement over the RJ4JP-01.
A friend stated the following:
In principle, the bearings themselves are not rigid enough to take the loads the could carry, hence encasing in alu housings. But, considering the forces we are talking about for our [3DP] applications, I don’t think that will be an issue. The biggest issue is deformation by assembly forces.
He purchased these clones, 3d drucker lager 8mm kugellagertechnik kunststoff lager RJMP-01-08 vollkunststoff lager 8mm x 16mm x 25mm 1 stücke, $0.50
Longer linear bearings
Use longer bearings instead of two. From Build a 3D printer workhorse, not an amazing disappointment machine:
Don’t use multiple linear bearings in line to increase the angular stability of a carriage. There are prolonged versions available for almost every linear bearing type , for example, use the LM8LUU form factor instead of two LM8UU.